You are here > Home Film Reviews Horror Flicks Science Fiction The Thing HD - Worth a Rewatch?
Thu 24 May 2012
The Thing HD - Worth a Rewatch? PDF Print E-mail
Written by Joe Bodia   
Wednesday, 14 September 2011 06:11

Tags: David Clennon | Keith David | Kurt Russell | Richard Dysart | T.K. Carter | Wilford Brimley

 

John Carpenter's The Thing

Aside form the fact that most people who've seen The Thing would be happy to see it again in standard definition, the recent HD push has resulted in decades-old films being re-released in high-def format. No film does this better than The Thing - a tale of an alien life-form slowly infecting and impersonating members of a snowed-in research team - and we'll tell you why.

A commercial flop in 1982, The Thing was hit hard at the box office. Having opened two weeks after E.T., and on the same day as Blade Runner, it wasn't a great time of the year to release a sci-fi survival horror, but the film's amazing special effects and solid story failed to connect with an eighties audience who preferred the cute alien and the dark world of neon and replicants that the other two films offered.

At its heart, The Thing is about two things - mystery and special effects. The mystery of who's a Thing and who isn't will stay with you long after the film ends, and you go off to bed or to log on at the PartyPoker site to take your mind off the freaky things you saw.

You'll see a lot of freaky things, by the way. This isn't a film for the fainthearted - mutating humans and animals, a lot of gore and tearing flesh as the alien assimilates more and more biological entities... Stan Winston and Rob Bottin, along with a talented crew of SFX wizards really pulled it off, and in high-def it looks even better, the quality of the anamatronics holding up even today.

The high-def format also brings out the best in the small details - names are clearer on clothing, the snow really swirls around the base, the creatures look fantastic, and as a whole the film looks sharper. This film could've been made in 2011, given how neat, well-shot and timeless it appears to be, although the clue to its age mainly lies in the youthful features of Kurt Russell and Keith David.

If there's a better sci-fi horror film, we've yet to see it. Check this out if you've got a HD set-up. You won't regret it. Well, until you're trying to get to sleep, that is.


blog comments powered by Disqus
Last Updated on Wednesday, 14 September 2011 12:36
 
Author of this article: Joe Bodia

Show Other Articles Of This Author

Cast from this movie also appeared in:

More movie features

Iron men (and women) we have loved
08 Jan 2011

Who doesn't love our robot friends, even the ones that want to wipe us out? Cinemalicious this week takes a look at some of filmdom's finest tincan companions... The star of Pixar's nint [ ... ]


Rock Beats Film
11 Nov 2011

He's known as The Rock, but you can also call him Dwayne. During a surprise stop in the city last month, we met up with the former wrestler and emerging movie megastar to discuss his accelerating  [ ... ]


More features

Movie Reviews

There Will Be Blood
Scott Murphey

There Will Be Blood boosts a hurricane of an acting performance stuck in a brief thundershower of a film - better yet, make that a long one. Academy Award winner (and rightfully so) Daniel Day Lewis [ ... ]


A Streetcar Named Desire
Jeffree Benet

Southern Gothic at it's finest.


More movie reviews


The latest feeds from other member sites of the Think Media network:

Thinky Approved Sites

Future Movies

Movies Found Online